Rolex Datejust steel automatic Kal. 1570 Ref. 1603 VINTAGE Reviews

NEWS WATCHES

Girard-Perregaux For Gucci: Dive XL Watch Hands-On
Gucci and the Sowind Group (that produce Girard-Perregaux watches) are both part of the larger PPR luxury group. These familial ties allows for unique creations such as this Gucci version of the well-known high-end Sea Hawk diver from Girard-Perregaux. With the Gucci name on it and a redesigned case, the timepiece is simply called the XL Dive, or sometimes just “Dive.” Interestingly, from a price perspective, it opens up a bit below the Girard-Perregaux model, so let’s see how it pans out.At Baselworld 2013 James Stacey and I spent time with Gucci to check out their new wares. He was actually the one to photograph these pieces – so you get my words with his wrist modeling the two Dive models. Just mentioning that in case the arm hair didn’t match the voice: we don’t like to confuse our fine readers. James actually didn’t have much to say about Gucci’s high-end diver with its solidly high-end Girard-Perregaux-produced movement. He is that
P.E.A.R On Notice! Apple Zealots Stalinize European Media When "Monopoly" Mentioned
P.E.A.R (People Enraged by Apple Relations) wants you to be aware of this! Watch this video of a Benjamin Cohen, a correspondent from UK broadcaster Channel 4 in the UK interviewing Apple Senior Vice President of Worldwide Product Marketing Phil Schiller. After you watch it, keep reading this article.Disturbing? That is really the term that came to mind for me. In case you are confused, as is possible, Apple is refusing to answer a reasonable question regarding the possibility that iTunes can be considered to have a monopoly on, well several things. Specifically, how use of an iPod is forcefully linked to using iTunes. Here the reporter asks an innocent enough question to an Apple employee who at the very least should have some canned response to the question. Instead, Apple Zealots seem to appear from behind the scene for some good ol’ fashion totalitarian style censorship with a happy face. “Better if people not know such information, question damaging to successful Apple